A Pennsylvania federal court ordered a new hearing after an ALJ credited medical evidence about one- and two-step tasks but omitted that limit without explanation. Rayner shows why the fit between the RFC and the jobs cited to deny SSDI and SSI benefits deserves close attention.
In Charles K. v. Bisignano, a New Jersey court required a clearer explanation of how stable examinations and questionnaire ratings supported an SSI denial.
A federal court vacated an SSI denial because the ALJ did not explain how the objective medical evidence supported two agency doctors’ opinions. The claimant won a remand, but several other challenges were rejected.
A Maryland federal court remanded an SSI denial because the ALJ did not adequately explain the evaluation of a counselor’s report.
For the sick, injured, and disabled.
And guidance for everyone else.
(267) 234-7465
Fax: (215) 258-9861
nfeden@fedenlawgroup.com
711 West Ave., Jenkintown, PA 19046
This website provides general information, not legal advice. Contacting the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship. Representation begins only after a written agreement. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
